Yep, thought this should be a interesting thread....:good
Are they in order?
Good list. But no Ketchel, Dempsey, Olivares or Langford?
Give me your top 10 p4p biggest punchers of all time in order...:good
I have read in a 1950's Ring Magazine. That they select the ratings of 1946 in early 1947........So thats why.....
Never count Zale out. But I think Mike is to well rounded a fighter for him and can take a decision......
Long over due lloyd marshall should of been inducted years ago
Interesting, how many places apart do you have them?
His chin also wasnt on the level of Hagler, Ali or De La Hoya.
If this is 110% true. It is simply embarassing. Why the **** would a man who dosent have to make a certain weight limt, dehydrate himself and dry...
Great fight............... Alexander stepping up, unlike Amir Khan who probaly wants to fight Morales or Hatton......:-(
Yep. Peoples rating or critera shound't be based on how Fitzsimmons would fair in other era's or how he stacks up in fantasy fights. He should...
No the ratings were 1946 http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine%27s_Annual_Ratings:_1946 Why so much love for Graziano? Lamotta and...
No Lamotta and Burley also should of been NBA number #1 contenders in reality. But for some reason Graziano was given the spot.....Pretty...
Ring Magazine Rating As Of 1946 1.Jake Lamotta 2.Charley Burley 3.Rocky Graziano Lamotta in 1946 was 9-0-1. Which included wins over Holman...
