I'm glad someone else sees through the "Margarito wanted a rematch" lie that floats around here.
[/I][/B] That is the way I view his power as well. I think the Williams-Pavlik fight will look a lot like Williams-Margarito.
You mean move up in weight if the opponents fight at a catch weight or an unreasonable weight. By your logic JMM is fighting a jr lightweight...
And I'll add that Morales was past his prime and out of his best weight for the rematches. Pac's people seem to feed off of weight drained fighters.
He also lost and got Ko'd on the way up. And Pac hasn't been 112 since he was a teenager. That is a tired topic.
I hope you're joking. If not you are truly ignorant.
Agreed. Even the over the hill Whitaker was better than anybody Pac has faced. I truly hope Cotto knocks his overrated ass out. The catchweight...
Just plain stupid for you to mention those fighters and their situations and even think about ranking Pac based on those fights.
[/B] Me too Dan. And most of them know very little about boxing outside of Pacquiao.
Doesn't look that way to me.:bart
You're seriously overrating Brewster here. Brewster is and always has been very beatable for Haye and many other heavyweights.
I agree with everything you said. But if the odds are right I'll bet on Haye because I think he's a live underdog and there is a chance with his...
That is a preview of the excuses. If Williams wins "winky was just a shell". If Williams loses"he wasn't **** anyway". It's a no win situation for...
And it still won't change the fact that your boy Margarito lost to Williams. Loaded gloves included :yep. But don't count on Winky winning.
Yes he was. In his prime during the 60's he was nearly untouchable. If I had to pick a best of all time it would be Pernell Whitaker.
