yep - and he's 37 years old. could have been a cracking boxer if he'd turned to it a decade ago.
Jesus. He's not going to have the cardio to follow up on this but FFS.
fury is absolutely for definite slower than he was in Wilder I (and far slower than against Wlad). the fight with Usyk is going to be between two...
I'm not sure FN looks quite as terrible as I might have feared. I daresay he'd be a real handful for most club level fighters.
this is proper, proper bull****, the very worst kind.
how did it ever come to this, seriously?
highly unlikely that it's Tyson. the guy's physique was at its best in his late teens. for the reasons already amply covered, Holy, Pac, and RJJ...
A very big shot to be fair, in an otherwise plodding performance.
I decided to Google helenius’ age , I’d forgotten it. My first search results showed ‘Finnish professional boxer’, which i initially read as...
In his prime very good, genuine world level, just not quite good enough to be a really strong title contender. I suppose properly strong...
maybe. the early 30s are rarely kind to fighters in the lighter weight classes, & JT has been boxing at pro & top amateur level for the thick end...
Risk and reward, and the over-fetishization of unbeaten/near-unbeaten records. e.g. Joe Joyce took five successive risky fights against strong...
Others have covered it, he's a little past his peak, for sure, but not far.
Yeah, at 37 Wilder is very comprehensively washed, I don't really think this bout would matter either way, but he was undoubtedly a dangerous...
this is absolutely correct. there are three very different things: (a) a slip/not a knockdown; (b) a glove-touching-canvas 'technical' knockdown...
