Not that I disagree about anything you say, I love foreman to death, but that's a very bias sample size. You'll obviously take more notice of one...
Pacquiao will be like, "Ummm...Joe Cortez up to 4 rounds only" and Mayweather will be like, "Joe Cortez up to 12 rounds, or no fight."
Morales = GOD!!
Ortiz fought four times in 2010...His lost against Maidana was 2 years ago, not to mention he had 1 draw after as well. Exact same thing happened...
The mentally handicapped are part of the disabled community too. You should be ashamed :nono
Castillo vs Corrales I - Had the most epic ROUND of the decade. Simply an epic finish. Just didn't expect the twist Barrera vs Morales I - More...
Exactly. Those ignorant tards should know better. They should learn a thing or two from the mayweathers about respect. :-(
Yeah you have a point. But DLH's also had the same advantage over pac plus reach and height. I think you could have had a slightly stronger case...
I agree, MArtinez 2010 would annihilate any version of marg. He was inexperienced at 16-0, but the fact that he managed to win around 25...
Don't you get it? OMG...the thread title CLEARLY does not imply who fought the more difficult fight, mayweather or margarito:patsch...INSTEAD...
Explain to me again how the DLH who fought mayweather can beat the williams that, as you've said, has the best chance of beating floyd (which btw...
You missed the part where I said: "One hundred years from now, there's won't be enough historians that will be critical of Calzaghe beating old...
Please, I was comparing the Paul Williams that Margarito fought vs the De La Hoya that Mayweather fought. It's a total BS to claim DLH would beat...
:lol: So the 33-0 near prime williams would get beat by mayweather's DLH...GTFO. That's a horrible analogy....LEt me try that: If Valuev fought...
We are talking about the fighter in the form that they fought the respective fighters. Of course DLH is more accomplished than williams. But the...
