Ive seen on many all time lists Frazier is ranked higher than Tyson. To me Tyson was always the better version. Does going 1-3 vs 70s Ali, beating...
Would he have beaten Floyd and Pac at 130? Primes obviously..
No disrespect to Dempsey, but Frazier is just the upgraded model. Dempsey < Marciano < Frazier < Tyson
Yes, good call!
So you'd take Olympian Usyk to beat prime Louis and Holyfield?
If Langford were around today he wouldn't be heavyweight. With weight cutting, he'd be at 168. So he'd be fighting Canelo and Benavidez.
Lets say there is a competition of the best in their prime, whoever can make 200lb, same day weigh in. Who comes out on top? Dempsey Marciano...
A better question is would you rank him above Ward, Canelo, Loma, Crawford, Inoue..?
Its impossible to compare eras. But going by the decades it should be.. Fitzsimmons Langford Langford Greb Armstrong Robinson Charles Ali Duran...
This is exactly what I was going to post. Hagler vs Crawford is a better fight.
This is the correct response. If Frazier beats Fury then there is no need for weight divisons at all. 200lb vs 270lbs.
1- Ali 2- Louis 3- Holmes 4- Lewis 5- Johnson 6- Foreman 7- Marciano 8- Holyfield 9- Tyson 10- Liston
Yeah and Tyrell Biggs was a copy of Ali, and Dubois is a copy of Tyson. Similar style doesn't mean similar level. Did either Klitschko ever...
So why did it work so well for Foreman? Who is arguably the greatest big man/slugger we've ever seen.
Neither Klitschko would beat him. Lewis and Tyson definitely beat him. Otherwise many others have a chance.. Ali, Louis, Holmes, Marciano, Frazier.
