Holmes (for his age) did much better in the 90s against Holyfield and Mercer than he did against Spinks and Tyson in the late 80s. Why was this...
Its because Canelo got the benefit of judges both times. Whereas Bivol legitimately lost the first decision. Sometimes its better to lose than to...
He was always top #2 next to Fury, from Wlad until Usyk came along. Its only now the new generation (Dubois, Parker, Agit, Bakole) is taking over...
Hes still the biggest draw $$
The best versions of both were the ones who beat Wlad. And I would say this fight would look quite similar to Fury-Wlad. Sure AJ will land more...
I would say most likely these are the top h2h that should beat everyone else.. 1- Lewis (50/50 with Usyk, Ali, Holmes, beats the rest) 2- Usyk...
1- Ali 2- Louis 3- Holmes 4- Lewis 5- Johnson 6- Foreman 7- Marciano After that it gets tricky.. You could make a case for Tyson or Holyfield...
Tyson was definitely better than 'post-Ali' Foreman, thats for sure.
Usyk would definitely beat Liston. Liston just wouldn't land and would get outboxed. Foreman is a 50/50. Either Usyk can't keep him off and George...
Agreed 100%. But if you include amateur as well.. then its Karelin, and its not even close!
Head to head its definitely Pacman though.. right?
I would say top #2 next to Wlad. #1- Wlad / Zhang #3 - Lewis / Joshua #5- Foreman #6- Shavers / Wilder #8- Tyson But if we are talking for...
Vitali is the most overrated fighter in history. He literally beat noone. The ONLY advantage he has is chin, and unless he is knocking Wlad out,...
B Brilliant post! The only thing I would disagree with is that Canelo was not pre-prime during Golovkin. I think it was exactly the start of his...
Usyk wins. Wlad is overrated. Beating povetkin and haye is not better than beating joshua and fury. Both of whom old wlad lost to.
