Great job. The top 4 names are ok, but there are some weird issues like Holyfield out of the top ten :think Oh well, democracy sucks...
Ringo Bonavena has not been mentioned so far, I think :think
No Tyson in her Top 10..... I think I am in love :D
Close match. But my vote is for Holy. Sure, Tyson can't be discounted entirely, but I think that Holy has the upper hand here. My impression...
Hearns is all wrong for Whitaker Hearns for late stoppage
I gotta agree with this. Discussing how smart and cunning Leonard was putting stipulations and choosing the right time to face Hagler is very...
Yep, I also remember all the Leonard-hype; that was nauseating, but it is also true that it was good for boxing's popularity and boxing's business...
Well, that would mean that Leonard was a better judge of Hagler's capacities, than Hagler himself.... that says something about how smart Leonard...
Pretty much like Foreman-Moorer. As far as Buster doesn't do anything stupid he should win by points
Same can be said from Bom Bom Mancini He had a hard time dealing with depression, and, according to many, he was never as aggressive as before
Hagler probably didn't either :yep I respect the testimony of Redroster and others on Hagler being shot. But again, that reflects badly on him,...
That's it. That, and the conditions accepted by Marv the whiny boy. Best explanation on what happened that awful night.
Duran wins by points, but Whitakers gives him a good run for his money
Good point. Thus, what is the difference between "shot" and "past his prime"? How to know? :think I understand that Hagler was past his prime...
Douglas beating Tyson has already been mentioned. Holyfield defeat of Tyson was also kind of unexpected
