Agreed RD - Louis and Tyson to me are the only two at the weight I could see having success lower down the totem pole with there style…
“Dog” isn’t a physical advantage, neither is timing - Foreman hits harder? Based on what? All we know is that they both definitely hit hard expect...
No, no that’s enough.
I could definitely see that RGS, I’d stand on it.
I think a big part of the love of 160lbs for me is it’s got the great 147lbers coming up to rumble and the 160lbers usually going for a 168-175lbs...
Middleweight stomps!
Let me explain this to you like you’re a witty 4 year old… Tunney TRIED to seek out harder fights, they turned him down, that was your criticism...
Now “Antagonise” is a strong word for a light hearted jab compared to your own hypocritical behaviour if you’re trying to play moral pillar. I...
What’s physical advantages in any way notable does GF have?
I’ll credit Galento despite his obvious “WWE Heel” bit, yes Patterson is a questionable champion if you’re comparing him to the men he listed...
:rolleyes: Marky I'm on your side here…George Foreman the scrappy little HW overcomes all the physical disadvantages possible somehow including...
:cheer:
I doubt Jackson could win but if he did land anything worthwhile he’d turn Hearns and anyone else basically into dust…
I’ve thought about this before… considering Gerald “Gman’s” proclivity towards all out aggression and how the rather rudimentary style of Barkley...
I think Foreman like Marciano overcomes his disadvantages in strength, size and reach with a big heart and that scrappy sort of wee sized old...
