Here are the questions you need to ask. Do swarmers need to be in top condition to be successful? I'd say yes. History has shown us that....
My friend who was a huge Frazier fan saw Foreman get lit up with counters in round 4.
I gave Frazier rounds 2 and 4 of the rematch. 2 is dull to be sure...maybe even, but if you didn't give him 4 I would call you an idiot and not...
I think the margin of error against Foreman is slim regardless of style. And Frazier did give him a good fight in the rematch when he wasn't a...
I don't buy this crap anymore. The Fraizer Foreman destroyed was comparable to the Tyson that Douglas beat... worse as Frazier wasn't even at his...
The only thing that Holyfield lacked was raw punching power and all the muscle mass he gained never really corrected that. He just didn't have...
Until after the Marciano bouts, Charles was at least an equal or better defensive boxer than Byrd. Byrd was a Southpaw who had lackluster offense...
Except for Briggs... Screw that guy and his fake win over Foreman lol. I'm fine with the rest.
The Rock was vastly superior at feinting, glassman.
We have to be the first generation if boxing fans that sees obesity as a positive lol. If this fight was proposed in the 50s...the average fan...
Did you even read the post you quoted? "Charles was considered past prime against Marciano because he simply was. He had became less consistent...
I have boxrec too. And if you've spent any amount of time on this forum you'd know exactly how this argument goes..... If you want to believe...
Let's be real...most the refrain "past prime" and "old" in reference to the Rock's opponents are parroting what they heard and don't even know how...
Here's a problem with this mindset. There are dominant Champions than there are Champions that weren't meant to last. Both are Champions. Just...
And hilariously, the age of Marciano when he fought Moore and Fat Don. Odd how nobody considers the wear and tear on a swarmer that turned pro...
