Showtime already confirmed it did nearly 100k on digital. What hasn't been announced is the linear numbers. The 50k number was made up out of...
King Kong has a broken hand. Joseph Parker didn't want to fight a complete nobody in a low money fight where Parker would only get 40% of the...
There was never one belt per weight class.
The purse bid is 75/25 in King Kong's favor. Don't rule out the possibility of PBC rolling the dice and forcing Hrgovic to fight over here under...
Points are redistributed by every bout. No points come in or get out of the system by this basic rating process But points get out of the system...
Because they're not champs in the eyes of the computers. They're just fighters. Being judged on who they fought. You're getting caught up in the...
The belts mean absolutely nothing in terms of computerized ratings. When you move up in weight you don't lose all of your points. That is why Usyk...
He's beaten a lot of fighters with great records and his only loss is a decision to the P4P #1. The other top fighters in the division have very...
it is the most trusted resource promoters, managers and networks use to assess the true standing of a fighter. the formula has been public...
Boxrec ratings are computerized and only take in ring results into account. All politics, belts and bias are ignored. So what you're really saying...
If Wilder's resume was weak, it would have been impossible to be the #1 fighter on earth according to the computerized ratings. If you really...
You can't counter my argument, so you're attacking me personally to distract from you week position. If you really believe I'm an alt, I'm...
I agree Ortiz was better than Stiverne, but the point remains that Wilder has several quality wins, why is why he was #1 in boxrec at one point.
Yes, he actually was. Even if you throw a temper tantrum.
Stiverne was #3 in TBRB at the time. No matter which of the most highly recognized ratings you go by, Stiverne was either #2 or #3.
