And of course you have the brains going by your choice of handle on here I guess your well hung too!
Might be a **** but I'm not wrong about you and your 'friend' suggesting that the Frazier of 71 and 73 are one and the same.
You and your John Thomas keep suggesting it all the time
Like I told your John Thomas anyone who beat a 29 year old Ali must be shyte!
Peak joe Frazier? Yea sure why not he deserves to be 50/50 with those guys he was a killing machine 68-71! and I personally think he beats Lewis...
Because anyone that beats a 29 year old Ali is obviously shyte?
The only people who deserve ridicule is the clowns who think Jamaica Frazier was a peak Frazier!
Can't be many mind there is a certain John Thomas lol
I think chocklab has told you (once or twice maybe) that Frazier was finished as a great fighter by the time he fought George. It seems you think...
I really can't believe this is even a serious debate to be honest. Lennox was a fine champion a week ATG imo but he beat a lot of top contenders...
Lennox would be able to control joe for a few rounds however Fraziers stamina and work rate will take its toll imo lennox wouldn't be able to keep...
Diddnt realise old Nino was a pro for 12 years before he made to a top contender! Talk about sticking at it! a lot of people would of quit after...
Yes your right I guess we will never know if he could handle a class super heavyweight. Do you think a 1951 Louis would beat Valdes and Baker though?
Joe Louis was the same size as Baker and Valdes and a top contender although obviously older.
