You can have be athletic, by way of having great agility, and balance... but not have very fast hands.
How about beating #1 and #2?:D Also, how about a couple years later when Wlad had beat everyone in the top 5 outside of his own brother, who was...
:good
I don't see how that is even relevant?
Once the WBC belt is vacated... it means nothing. The WBC has meant next to nothing ever since Vitali's first retirement. Explain... what is the...
In the beginning of 2006, Ring Magazine had these rankings for the heavyweight division.... 1. Byrd 2. Rahman 3. Toney 4. Brewster 5. Ruiz 6....
All of that nonsense died years ago. Also, when Lewis retired, everything after that was up in the air. Wlad and Peter were the top two contenders...
There is a "bum" on earth that could step into the ring and beat Wladimir Klitschko, even at this stage of his career. That's just silly. Fury...
Mayweather definitely would not have gone undefeated. His career would have been much more exciting to watch though. Chavez twice Whitaker...
I've been great! Extremely busy, but great. I expected Wlad to lose, if I'm being honest. I told all of my friends that Wlad should have...
Frustration. Imagine if Wlad would have grown angry enough to hit him with his fist during the fight?
I always thought that Tommy Brooks and Wlad were a great match.
Great stuff, Rummy!
Wlad lost because at this stage in Wlad's career, Fury was exactly the right man, with the right style, skill set, and mentality to beat him.
:rofl:rofl
