Does the same apply to every division
So, if Golovkin puts together a string of strong defenses, but doesn't beat cotto, and Stiverne does the same but doesn't beat wlad, would you...
That is kinda what I was saying, some people say that Stiverne needs to beat Wlad. But if he beats a few opponents around the top ten then he...
Yeah I get that, it's just you responded to my reply as if it was about something else.
So you honestly think Stiverne and Arreola were genuinely the most desrving to fight for the WBC title?
But I don't agree that Stiverne deserved to be his mandatory. I think he was ranked there due to someone's influence and not on merit
The quote to which this was a response was regarding Brook being ranked above thurman
When Froch picked up his current titles Ward was the number 1.
I'm not saying you're wrong, but I don't feel people apply the same logic to other divisions, and accept someone as a genuine champ without...
So would you be happy that he is genuine champ if he beats just one opponent out of for example Wilder, Pulev, Povetkin, Fury, Glazkov? And...
Why did Arreola deserve a higher ranking than Pulev Povetkin, Fury, Adamek?
But he was always ranked higher, was he not?
That's fair enough, I consider Froch a genuine champ, and most people do. However he didn't beat the number 1 in the division to get the titles,...
I think the Brook case is a little different, because Brook was more established than Thurman and has always been ranked higher. Brook also beat a...
So why does the same logic not apply to the hw division. Froch is a legit world champ because he has some good defences of his title. So if...
