you are biased agaisnt tyson, hook.. it is becoming funny. alltough tyson ain't a favorite of mine you have to be honest.. bringing up tyson...
if rocky is an ATG (wich ofcourse he is) then how the hell isn't holmes ?? his rsume is just as impressive. larry had a wonderful, great, almost...
i must say as a person i always disliked tyson. but the last years he comes over more mature and wise. even talking sense. it's a good interview
i really liked ali vs ellis a lot
i agree with most of what he writes only not holy and mariano and frazier.
hmm i am not so sure of that. i think in the glory days of unlicensed boxing the toplevel fighters where pretty good
recently i have been watching some unlicensed boxing. guys like lenny mclean and roy shaw. how do you people think they would do against the HW...
maybe i am a bit dumb but i don't understand the task as you call it. but............ if i have to say wich list qualifies as best/better/tougher...
naseem hamed was also a big showboater
hmm as much as i like ali i think he looses one of those bouts. young ali was indeed way to fast for george. but liston was no foreman with those...
i think highly of him but he ain't superman.. and i think he gets a bit overrated sometimes.. and if you read my answer correctly then you must...
we agree again mr. bienstock.. is it becoming a habit ?? though i don't have so much boxing knowledge as some others on this site. i think...
what made the seventies great ?? for example : johan cruyff and the dutch "total football"..
well maybe they think that because of frankie campbell and earnie schaaf ?? i think this one is a tough one to predict a victor. like people...
true and he was funny also. watch this : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvxBDvy3rSQ
