"5 stars = both opponents have 331 ratings points at least ~ best 100 boxers" 1 [IMG]Lucian Bute849 2 [IMG]Andre Ward752 3 [IMG]Carl Froch668 4...
Anyone understand it? Froch vs. Johnson is 4 stars despite Froch's past fights being as tough as virtually anyones and Johnson being, well Johnson
Not a good comparison to Tom Dallas
Big Bucks and Quevaga double at Cheltenham this year :D Edit: or is that the wrong forum...
Benn - Eubank 1 was good too - brutal agressor versus master counter puncher
Had it a draw, thinks Degale has the more potential even though he's older and it's no bad thing for him to get a loss. A loss is ok, being...
I had Kessler by 2, thought Froch wanted it but Kessler was desperate for it. Maybe the problems took away Froch's edge. Then he would've been...
At times, Geale looked like a less powerful (and orthodox) Calzaghe. Sylvester definitely looked like a less powerful, less turtle-like Abraham....
sneak preview of result?
Johanneson :blood
David Barnes
He should fight Brook.... or at least Jennings
paper champs
You obviously don't know the other fighters who beat him :patsch
I think on opponents, this probably gives a good indication of McCloskey's level: http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_id=7958&cat=boxer
