The apology was probably part of the settlement.
He would have had to meet the 'actual malice' standard, which is a little different than it sounds. He would have to prove that Mayweather either...
Defamation requires more than just that, at least when it comes to public figures. What you said above makes Mayweather sound like a shitty...
Not necessarily, no. The American Way is that each side pays their own way. Sometimes it's available and sometimes it's not. I don't mean to be...
Because litigation is expensive. If it was a slam dunk then why didn't they settle earlier? They probably saw the bills mounting up and both sides...
Mayweather probably agreed to cover Pacquiao's legal fees, make an apology, and maybe something a little extra on top. I see folks throwing around...
Next you'll claim his sexiness is overrated. Edit: ...beaten to the post.
I think he's right, and I also think he's being fair to Ward. Just about every example I can think of where a fighter has dropped down in weight...
I don't give a **** how much, if at all, Rigondeaux has ****ed over his manager, an injunction to prevent him from fighting is wrong. He cannot be...
Sorry, but Tyson Fury deserves that honor.
Mayweather can probably fight any two opponents combined and make as much as or more than a Pacquiao fight. He'd get a higher percentage of money...
Still, there shouldn't be an injunction. In this country you have the right to break a contract. You just have to be prepared to pay damages....
These kind of decisions suck. There should never be injunctions in boxing matches over disputes with promoters or managers.
I wonder if anyone explains to these guys how expensive litigation can be.
This is just dishonest. Lewis didn't spring anything on anyone.
