Haye won clearly that fight. Of course he was cautious and did not want to brawl with this monster. It would have been stupid. Btw I also think...
Considering he was still doing well in nineteens when he was only a shadow of his former self I gotta say that he would be very difficult opponent...
Azumah Nelson was probably the best African fighter ever. Kassim Ouma was not that bad either.
This is exactly what I think as well. Good list but I would have Wilder ahead of Pulev. And definitely Haye before Teper. But all in all a good...
Mayweather
I think that Haye looked very good actually. Of course the opponent was mediocre but Hayes punches looked sharp and relaxed. I won't be surprised...
I see both of those as 50/50 match ups. For me Haye looked very good against De Mori but lets see how he looks against better opposition.
Why to cry over some scorecards when fight ended by spectacular KO? Just asking.
I see this 50/50 match really. Furys win over Wlad was great of course, but other than that I have not seen anything special about him. Fury is...
http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxing_images2/Carlos_Baldomir3.jpg
This is exactly how I think as well. I don't know why there is so much hate towards Wilder.
With Joshua and Haye (if he still trains) it would be 50/50. Fury could also be quite difficult. All the others would be easy job for Wilder.
No test for PEDs in 70s and 80s.
Yes he is roiding. But tell me who is not.
I am surprised that so many people seem to be so naive about this matter. Cheating is very easy in pro boxing and without them it is almost...
