a genius who doesn't know the meaning of "fact". you're a moron, but at least your threads are entertaining.
stating facts? you're talking about hypotheticals, moron. all this crap that comes out of jeff m, i'm thinking he must be running some sort of...
definitely. saw the 1st fight for the first time last weekend. that whole pac hater story of "jmm got knocked down 3x in the 1st then outboxed pac...
i take your point about dundee's importance in those fights. but i think the trainer's main job is to develop the fighter such that he can execute...
i think it depends on the fighter's adaptability in the ring. e.g. ali often ignored corner instructions (both during training and in a fight)...
i'm not sure he took all 4 rounds either. the 1st round he scored 1 good punch but was backing all the way. the 4th was quite close. i think...
of course! don't know much about rugby but he was supposed to be superstar in that sport right? wonder why he left it. this got me thinking,...
nothing at all. joking only bro. you need good core and butt strength for that ****.
I'm not talking about fighters who won gold in 2nd grade long jump. i mean, e.g., rocky marciano, although he failed, was good enough to get a...
what exactly don't you agree with? and tell me how you think calzaghe beats ray.
yeah, joe was punching before he even reached hopkins creating an illusion of workrate. a lot of the slow-motion replays show him throwing...
disagree with this. this would be sort of like joe vs bhop except srl had more power, more stamina, and that stamina would be amplified by srl's...
this is where the misunderstanding lies. the question is, hearns vs joe at 168. p4p, hell yeah, hearns splits joe a new *******, but tommy...
one thing i'd disagree with other well-meaning posters is your speed. i'm not saying you don't have it, but punching the way you did can create...
in "boxing's greatest workouts", it said that nigel benn didn't spar much either. maybe it's a brit thing?? or these two are naturals.
