That's a lovely turn of phrase to describe it.
Mayweather 116-112
If I wasn't British I probably wouldn't care much what happened to either of these two now. But any Brit who tells you they wouldn't be buzzing...
I meant "more" as in a greater volume of them, soz
I don't think stats should come into it because you have to score based on what you see live. I'll say this - I saw more effective punches landed...
You don't score for unlanded punches though. And you can't minus his "effective aggression" score for unlanded punch stats. You could squeeze in...
Brilliant fight, brilliant fighters. I have it clear for Bivol, can see why others wouldn't. That fight is what boxing is all about, whoever won....
Then surely you know that classical music is still being written and performed, and was never the music of the masses?
Not that I'm a fan of this either, but... sure, you're a big opera and ballet fan, right? :lol:
WHO listens to this?
Well this is ****ing vapid.
That's exactly what's just happened to me I suppose, but in this case it's my own stupidity that's cost me. The snooker example seems a bit dodgy...
Not in terms of how well known either fighter is, no. I went to the pub to watch it earlier - but it turns out the biggest pub chain in the...
Whaaat I got 4/5 with them an hour ago! Oh. I probably just bet on any outcome. What a spazz.
I assume those facts all pertain only to light-heavy?