Fighting once a year by definition results in many challenging opponents being missed. You can't clean out a division fighting so infrequently....
Nothing good about fighting once a year. It robs fans of all the big fights that would happen if they were more active. The fact they get a pass...
McCall and Rahman were not great fighters by any stretch of the imagination. McCall couldn't even beat Bruno and a shot Tucker, he barely scraped...
You had guys like Moorer and Rahman becoming lineal champs. That's not what I would expect in a strong era. Tyson scored all his best wins in...
I don't think Mchunu was top 10 at the time he faced Usyk
I think this era could rate above the 1990s in terms of talent. Why 3rd?
Charles has a better chin based on what exactly? If anything Patterson is probably more durable
Liston probably beats Marciano in 1955
Patterson weighed roughly the same size as Ellis and Machen. He wasn't super undersized given his era I doubt he was 5'9 either,
Interesting. I'm not sure what his path to victory would be in these fights. Jones is so much faster than Marciano how would he land effectively?
Wouldn't you favor Roy Jones to beat him? What about Bivol, Beterbiev?
Why can't people have been wrong regarding Wilders status? It's not like it hasn't happened before. It's also not as if Wider had a great resume...
How can Fury be dominating anything with 3 wins over ranked opponents? Without Usyk in the picture there would be massive doubts due to him not...
AJ and Fury have not dominated post Klitschko and Usyk had no need to agree to a rematch with Fury or even fight him to begin with
I don't think Jones, Mathis, Machen or Foster were ranked in the top 10
