yeah, because less than 25 years of "scientific study" by mma completely disproves generations of development of martial arts. i'm sure that bruce...
well said.
i find martial arts very interesting, but mma (particularly the ufc) has more in common with schoolyard brawling than anything from a martial arts...
who, other than people in this forum (like boxing analysts) have called calzaghe an atg?
becoming an atg is easy, just be born before 1920.
that's exactly the point i was making. having a father and an uncle that started training him from a very young age is (one of the reasons) why...
no, you're absolutely right, i apologize. training acheives nothing, it's just an "intense" waste of time. only someone handpicked by christ...
oh, yeah, sily me, how can intense training possibly increase you ability to do impressive things. boy do i feel stupid. nothing hurts my feelings...
i think that some of floyd's "speed" is really just good timing, which comes from training, something he's done his whole life to an insane...
hahahaha. no more ridiculous than your thread, pal.
well, at least about the rascist part. :)
yeah, it's almost as if i was making a point about how stereotypes are idiotic and using them to support an argument accomplishes nothing. hmm,...
yeah, seeing as how calzaghe has never fought and will never fight someone even close to ali. oh, and it's "could have" not "could of".
i'm guessing that you've never actually "come across" them at all. it's far more likely that you've watched one event on a crappy pub television...
i gotta agree. and cmon, not being able to have a reasonable analysis of a fighter because you are too immature to get past the fact that they...
