P4p means exactly you have to judge career or single attribute (power, speed..) regardless their WEIGHT DIVISION. If a 500 pound boxer is the best...
Yes, absolutely.
He had another Ud over Hayman. Hovewer his power wasn't overrated by any means, except if you have Hearns above the likes of Jackson in term of...
Imagine what Foreman would have done to a small slow brawler like Peralta. He would have KILLED him within 30 seconds. Oh wait, they actually...
This. Reasons: -One punch ko. -an iron chinned opponent (never koed before and after) completely out -behind on point -very important fight
P4P= greatness regardless weight DIVISION (and NOT weight). Tyson fought at heavy only, so he has to be the best pure heavyweight ever (which he...
On the contrary: very very underrated.
Overall McCall Chuvalo Mercer Puritty Cobb Champions Marciano Ali Foreman Holmes Holy (hurtable, but mad recuperative power)
Similar size: no, Bruno was 6.3' 225 in his prime, not that bigger than Haye And you forgot speed, which is clearly in favor of Klitschko...
Unfair advantage? There's no such a thing in the heavyweight division, which is unlimited for a reason.
No, because P4P means "regardless weight division" and NOT "regardless weight". Tyson was definitely an heavyweight, so if you consider Lewis a...
Clearly you know nothing about motivation leading to divide boxing in different weight classes with the last one being without limit superior.
Calzaghe over Hopkins. Joe won fair and square plus Hopkins wasn't shot by any means (they were both past their primes, though)
He always fought in his natural (and only one possible) weight division. So his P4P ranking cannot be higher than his heavyweight ranking.
I miss your point. Physical attributes are part of the game, so if Tyson or Webb lack some, it's not a problem of the observer. However, Tyson is...
