Why are you coming at me with all these sources? You know as well as I do that they are generally full of holes and overall quite ****. Packey...
You are so far offering little to have faith in when you seem to believe an Ike Williams is, I don't know, fifty or something, when Holman is...
Fan boy :-( I defy you to separate Williams and Williams by a tier. Let alone ****ing four or five, ****. I'd have it like: 28. Ike 31....
Yeah ****ing good, you are driving me to regular profanity here. But you should be actively thinking of Ike Williams. Such a tough era he fought...
Yes and I just amended it, so is Lloyd Marshall. It was a list did some time ago. Is that all you have to say? Move Ike somewhere sensible.
Tier seven or eight? For Ike Williams when Holman is in three? Mate are you ****ing losing it? Here's what I could find off my own back. All...
Same. There's just no ****ing way Holman Williams is greater than Ike. I really will have to work on my list. So far it goes: 1. Harry Greb 2....
Okay then.
I really don't see how Harry Greb couldn't be rated as one of the best - ability wise - of all time. I understand that it would be silly to offer...
I really did believe it was a 'given' among sensible boxing historians that B. Leonard was greater than Ali. Gans too, although to a slightly...
He did. I'm repeating myself now, but I love the fact that a rated 211lbs Lavorante had to be 'carried from the ring on a stretcher' in 1962 -...
Yeah Pep has real credentials. I like seeing him rated high. I love a top five Pep. But like I always say, Moore amazes me every time I look at...
You're right, Pep does get a bit underrated. Above Duran and Fitzsimmons (so, #8 for me) but one below Moore. Why? Moore first beat a rated...
Dempsey was ****ing **** and you know it.
Must... Resist... Ahh... :dead