How
There is no footage but frizzie zivic vs al bummy Davis was pretty bad, through the first round zivic had dominated using thumbs and elbows...
post some of the most dangerous boxers of all time e.g sonny Liston, Stanley ketchel, jack Dempsey
You use sources that saw them fight
http://www.cyberboxingzone.com/boxing/Article-PeterJackson.htm It's all in there
I'm not saying that, I'm just saying havin ga good record doesn't win a fight
Btw Corbett said Jackson could beat any fighter he had ever seen including white fighters so he is not biased because he hated Johnson
I made that post agreeing with you that frank Slavic was a good win, but that doesn't matter because a record doesn't win fights, ring ability...
Fitsimmons rated Jackson above Johnson, I didn't even mention stiller and if you don't consider Corbett an objective source that's just you, point...
Yeah because you were focusing on record rather than their actual ring ability, I have always thought that you judge fighters place in history on...
I only said it because you were talking about record and there has been many times when the fighter with the weaker record wins.
He also lost to bill Tate in 1917
If record means everything then how did bill Tate beat Sam Langford?
I rate on people who saw them both, people like bob fitsimmons who called Jackson the greatest fighter of all time, bottom line it would be a good...
I really with there is footage existing of Jackson, described as more scientific than Jack Johnson, was faster and smoother than Joe Louis but hit...