Hamed's balance was both a strength and a weakness. It allowed him to invest his entire body in a punch and therefore gave him excellent one-punch...
Who achieved more, who beat the better opposition, who had the better skills etc. all questions to consider before offering an opinion.
Simple question.
His size, strength and durability would make him a force in any era.
delete
Hamed.
Floyd knocking out Ortiz. I'm changing the meaning of the word 'humble'
Wow, thanks, that means so much to me, random internet guy.
Reid/Ottke
I'm wondering who that opponent is....Bel Castro?
I'm not blaming the loss on anything. It is what it is. Just saying that '95 Hamed was 'the best' version so '01 was "past best." by a good few years.
Controversial but I believe it's definitely true Naz was past his best. Barrera's style (and tactics) made it difficult for Hamed to win on...
McKinney would have caused Naz a lot of problems.
Apologetic? Naz was a boxer not a Nazi.
That title doesn't mean ****.
