Gayvid hahahaha
Benn would stand a better chance against James Toney i think who was around at the time at 160lbs but Toney would`ve beat him on points or late ko.
At 160 lbs Hearns smashes Benn,that is a gauge from the Hearns v Haglar fight `85.At supermiddleweight maybe different.
Fury will duck Monte absolutely.Fury is a gypo joke.
I reckon Benn would get slaughtered.Either by The hitman or Haglar but Benn would`ve been a good fighter against either.
Skint as i am i might just stump up for sattelite tv to watch this one IF this fight is actually on.To see Haye levelled is worth the money.
:shock:Wow wow,hang on,we never had fighters like the mexicans,so we don`t have the same interest or respect overall for our own crop.In Mexico...
Antonio Barrera is well respected over here,like Cesar Chavez,Salvador Sanchez was.Barrera beat Naz comprehensively,but Naseem was a superb...
Don`t quite know why the big vote for Haye,not saying i was a fan the fraud **** but Fraudley Audley should be given the biggest vote.I even rate...
Corrupt British boxing again,yawn,i`m much more inclined to believe the 23 people,British and Non British on here saying Burns won without one...
Don`t know if he was ever as good as the great Mexican you mentioned but i laughed my arse off when some proper knnob on ESB was talking about Naz...
I don`t know.There`s always something someone has to say to disparage one of Britains greatest fighters.Trash talk like he was classless,vastly...
James Toney beats Chris Eubank and Nigel Benn,but Benn would be a tougher nut to crack.Toney like he did with Roy Jones would hold his chin out...
This idiot madmanc is disgracefully disrespecting probably the greatest fighter Britains had.The guy was answering someones rundown of Jimmy...
And Gay haye never got punished for his 3rd rd bet.I mean,was that a staged fight or what?
