Langfords technique and defense is superior to modern era, lost in this analysis is after every punch Langford going for tie ups or his opponents...
this talk about Driscoll having trouble with a swarmer is foolishness the guy hes fighting is trying to swarm and failing, what is not being...
which report was this ? both Mcfarland and Driscoll are superb despite what dummies in here said !
make sure you talk about infighting with Pat M who doesnt know **** ,thats why he wants answer cuz he doesnt know **** despite being a boxing...
I literally typed boxingforum24 jim driscoll and read your goofy ass post on the skillset of Jim driscoll ,same way i typed sinister jim driscoll...
Evander has flaws that would get exploited by better less flawed fighters ala Tunney and Langford ,dude is beatable without a doubt.
This is a good fight and there is reasons that philly looked odd in the fight( I have analyzed half the fight and have notes) Burns himself was no...
What are your opinion on Langfords inside technique , Is he on par with your darling Sun kil Moon ?
Oh I that idiot on he ignore list, No arguments just declarations I dont have time for skip bayless/stephen a smith dummies!
who are you talking too?
Langfords outside game was outstanding too, he would walk into your space drawing your jab (ala rocky etc) but unlike Rocky he was very good at...
It boils downs to tactics and strong traits for me , Jess would beat someone who couldnt get past the jab (braddock) but Rocky built his style off...
another dumb dumb , but I go over these posts so the next guy doesn;t take what dumb dumb says as gospel. Dempsey did set up his shots what...
Number 1 easily Langford number 2 Tommy loughran Number 3 archie moore number 4 Wills number 5 Bivins indistinguishable the rest
Ketchel can be number 1 on this list ,you should research more!
