there are so much rich good boxing history with better boxers and everybody is stuck in the 70s 80s and 90s thats what I think!
Whats the GFC version and where can more of this fight be seen? I am puzzled by the fight outcome as well, It is not like Packey sucks but I didnt...
They would do the same , you gotta pay attention to how rocky fought, he didnt just walk forward upright and get abused . He would wait for you to...
even better than pocket defense is stepping deep enough after throwing to tie up the opponent and prevent return fire or pivoting of landed shots...
actually yes Louis shut ezzards eye closed with the jab I am willing to bet if I analyze the first 8 rounds of that fight , Ezzard got hit with...
Willard is out in round 1 , This rockys best matchup he was jab heavy and did not have much on the inside , Marciano beats him while drunk !
I am talking overall not recent times
Watch Carefully ,slowly and over and over again footage of Tunney and Lastarza. Here are just some of the differences between Tunney and Lastarza....
From the looks of the way Norton applied that guard he would be ripe to solid lead hooks to the body . Gene Tunney tore Tommy Gibbons with lead...
lastarza is nowhere near the level of gene tunney like not similiar in style or skill at all, and Moore was weak to the lead hook(dempseys best...
Langford knocks Sugar out , he is a better version of Joe Louis . The only guy I would take over Langford (and not convincingly ) is Greb.
Rocky landed more counters to jab than joe louis landed jabs , you are right these folks are clueless about Rockys ability to deal with the jab.
yes this is more of Futchs keen eye of observation than it is , Nortons natural jab technique!
yeah na you got plenty of threads do that , your opinion on legendary is subjective , hall of famers already in the hall is fact,lets stick to facts!
It was a lost art by the time Ali began his era hence why I do not think the 70s era was all that technical!
