This was very nearly my pick too! Went with ‘91 because I felt the bottom three were stronger, but could flip a coin on it. That’s a very tough...
Nope, I don’t think so.He’d try,not succeed, and grind out the decision….I thought Tua had a great chin.
Both! Foreman does the better overall work and gets the decision.
Interesting! That’s a solid list. I like 1991: 1)Evander Holyfield 2)Mike Tyson 3)Riddick Bowe 4)Razor Ruddock 5)Ray Mercer 6)George Foreman 7)Tim...
Amazing talent, he seemed to derail a bit after the Rosario fight but as others have said, ended up fighting for year longer than many expected. I...
Maybe Julio Cesar Chavez Sr?
I’d go for Ruddock in this one. As much as I like George generally and cheered him on in his comeback, I don’t think he was that good in the 90s....
Agreed, tons of fine skill. I enjoyed De La Hoya - Mosley 1 for similar reasons.
Amir Khan springs to mind for me.
That’s fascinating…I had exactly the same experience as you with the Fab Four!
This is something I experienced back in the 90s, for example. I loved watching Tyson when I was getting interested in boxing as a teenager back in...
Yes, he did well in the long run. Oh….forgot one that I actually saw live. Damon Reeds challenge of Herbie Hide.
“Could have”, definitely. “Would have” - maybe….I think that depends more on his goals and mindset on the night.
You can tell Ruddock was still developing and was prone to right hands…his “smash” hadn’t quite emerged and was more of a heavy hook, but he did...
Maybe the Reggie Gross fight? That’s on youtube.
