and you have an ego as well. you are so sure of yourself that you haven't said once in this whole thread "maybe I am wrong" given the fact that...
since testing has been brought into boxing? you are uneducated and should stop posting. Pacquiao has been involved in the same type of testing...
I respect your background, but I really don't agree with your logic. It doesn't really make sense and either you and a tiny portion of boxing fans...
I really disagree with your logic. I fan should be able to see a fight and judge who wins accurately. It's like watching any other sporting event...
so you are saying that you are more accurate than compubox? find me the round and I will watch it. because I want to see an 18 punch difference.
I thought Marquez won that fight, was it crystal clear like this? No, but I thought he won. This is apples and hockey pucks though.
no, the fans and the writers are what make the sport therefore they are the ones who should determine who the winner is. that is the reason for...
excellent point!
no the value of someone who gets paid to follow a sport compared to a fan is not the same.
okay, so how do you know compubox is wrong? I hear it said sometimes, where does it say that? is there a study? or is it like saying there is a...
oh, so you are one of the gifted few who saw the fight correctly? haha okay
so compubox is wrong, the sports writers are wrong, and the majority of the fans are wrong......if everyone is wrong, perhaps a new sport should...
everyone has a bias? everyone...it's a human characteristic.
so power means nothing if you can't land a punch, but punches landed has no bearing on the fight...contradiction? if the fighter lands more...
but the sport is for the fans......nevermind!! if boxers were the only ones with vaild opinions on a sport and are the only ones with input into...
