After watching pac/marquez 3 i went public and expressed my disappointment. I felt like marquez won, hands down. But then i went back and watched...
fair enuff my friend.
w/the exception of a few of a those names, the rest have been in the 28-34 age range when they lost to pac. those r prime years. please do your hmwk.
and your argument is this: ortiz beat berto....and now he deserves 2 fight, arguably, the greatest p4p fighter??? again...your argument is weak....
ortiz is not in his prime. 1 good win doesnt mean u r in your prime. he's only 24. a few years down the line, he'll be in his prime.
so he beat berto....and now he deserves a shot??? thats funny. your argument is weak and bias. sorry.
good job on avoiding the question.
way 2 avoid the point. lol
again...who has ortiz beaten, besides berto?
ortiz just moved up from the 140 weight division 1 fight ago. he got a draw with lamont peterson and he quit against maidana.....yet he deserves 2...
who has ortiz beaten besides berto?
he fought marquez at 144...and he didnt even make weight. not to mention marquez never fought that heavy. please try again.
props for fighting a 24 yr old??? really??? u must be a floyd fan...im a boxing fan. big difference my friend.
thats embarassing.
R U SERIOUS???? 4 all u anti pac fans who have criticized pac for picking tailor made opponents....and fighting @ catchweights, etc....u have no...
