This thread derailed into a shitstorm, smh. And yes, Dempsey, and any ATG heavyweight for that matter, would dominate the current division.
[MEDIA] Raúl Macias vs Nate Brooks starts out slow but it turns into an exciting slugfest.
I think that's a pretty interesting point and comparison, and while I still hold my opinion that Dempsey would win, that does make me look at it...
I think Dempsey would've won. If a past prime and out of shape Dempsey gave Tunney a run for his money, then I'm sure a prime Dempsey would...
Both fighters in their primes at welterweight, who takes the win?
Marciano. Strong and durable, he'd go 50-0 after this one
I agree with most lists, but I think Raúl Macias has good potential to be there, he's pretty underrated but was a great fighter.
1. He was the baddest man of his time lmao. 2. He was a ferocious fighter and a powerful puncher. He was sort of an all-arounder; fast, strong,...
Jack Dempsey, because of his ferocious style and how he was a man of many talents both in and out of the ring. Strong, fast, aggressive, and...
Yeah they were WEAK and PRIMITIVE times with INFERIOR ATHLETES, nothing like the Almighty BYRD
Bro if that happens I swear I mean uhh Dempsey gets floored 7 times in the first round against Byrd
It's almost like you WANT to die
Idk, but I feel I lean towards Moore a bit Tough, but Duran Hearns Ketchel.
Ali vs Foreman Hagler vs Hearns Leonard vs Durán 2 Marciano vs Walcott Foreman vs Lyle
Probably Greb UD or MD assuming it's his prime
