It doesn't work this way
I'd say it's not any less reasonable than believing that Carnera won fixed fights at the top level.
No
People are getting better at trolling here, this one is cute.
Very detailed analysis. Which is the same thing a lot of fighters still do now.
Even here I strongly disagree, but there are many fighters at lower weights who peaked considerably higher than Tyson.
Fair enough, so what makes Gans less impressive than 1940s fighters, other than different video quality and earlier birth date?
I don't think people realize how many fighters peaked higher than Tyson.
That's what I'm talking about. Just look at him fighting, he's bad. His opponent is stiff as hell in this video and he beat Bean basically by...
Greb fought in the 1920s, not the early 1900s. You even don't know that...
I'm glad to hear that and I respect your opinion as well. Let's just agree to disagree on that matter. I already spent too much time on Butterbean...
As usual, no details. Just your usual 'boxers sucked back then"... except with SRR, with him your logic doesn't matter anymore
Butterbean was a high volume fighter for a two rounds, when his opponent is overwhelmed because he can't defend himself properly from wild swings....
None of us knowns
Believe me, I do. We have a world level fighter who could struggle against high volume, powerful punchers and a circus act who beat other circus...
