Ali didn't go either to be fair.
Liston has a solid resume, come on...
Corbett never weighed 170 lbs in all listed fights we have. He was bigger than quite a few HW champions after him - Tunney, Charles, arguably...
Which book taught you such a ridiculous view on boxing? Reach and weight measurements. So you're starting to get the difference between facts...
Did he? I have never seen him listed below 170 lbs and he consistently weighed above 180 lbs.
Bill Russell wouldn't have any physical disadvantages against modern centers.
He was always in constant motion and had very unique footwork.
Sure, it's almost impossible to say who hit harder really. It's just my uneducated guess.
I meant his punching power. He showed it more in consstent basis than Walcott. Walcott was likely physically stronger.
Corbett made you think that's true
Corbett was bigger than Tunney. His size was quite normal for the majority of eras until 1970s.
Sounds like some people view it as a robbery, though 6-4 fights are usually close enough. Looking through all the sources available, it seems that...
I know you do.
I'd say Carnera, because Corbett isn't treated like a circus act who couldn't fight.
I'm sure I could get better with that, I am far from expert. Educate me, break down Langford vs Jeannette and show me why Langford is so much...
