Regardless of the thread meaning to get to your comment is this proven Manny took roids?
He didn't have the skills or jab of Hearns. impossible.
They both were the high levels. Hearns opponents were probably more high level on the all time list. Manny engaged and so did Hearns. How do...
Wow. What a comparison. Hearns dominated more but lost his two biggest fights. I pick Thomas Hearns. Manny was good but hard to say. Why...
and if we are going to mention title defenses. Well the guy Hearns beat rather easily Virgil Hill had 10 defenses in 1991 and Hearns beat him...
It isn't like Hearns is weighing more at those weights. A 145 pound 6-1 guy has a body which is susceptible, and stamina and all the rest. Why did...
Hearns had something like 9 title defenses in his career added up. And with the guys Holmes fought, he should have won. Hearns is more iconic....
Holmes was 35 when he was beaten. 3 year difference is not much, considering Marciano's style. Holmes leaves a career of questions. Hearns does...
I wish Holmes would have fought everyone. And losing to Spinks a lightheavyweight hurt his legacy. That 49-0 thing of Marciano was overrated a...
that is why he was considered a freak at his weight. You really think Tommy Hearns could have fought at 175 in 1980? And you really think Holmes...
Hearns in everyway. Fought better guys had better knockouts. Holmes fought overrated and old guys and ducked others. Hearns was iconic. Holmes...
Thomas Hearns was a great legend. Underrated in someways. The guys he fought and beat. Cuevas,Benitez,Hill, Duran. And the first three he took...
This is the best knockout of all time. Tommy Hearns was just awesome at 154 knocking out Roberto Duran.. Two legends fighting and a great...
it is called boxing not running.
Duran was so overrated!!!
