you're still 3 "great" fighters short ;)
but wlad has earnt his stripes (and then some) he's the only champion that matters I wish people would stop crediting bogus pretenders to the...
another way of saying it would be that froch and Kessler are 0-3 against the best fighters at SMW they were bridesmaids at SMW, and Kessler's tag...
I think you mean 2 HOF'ers and froch ;) "3 greats" is more than a bit rich
I agree that froch pips Kessler for resume, but neither have ever been the best at SMW having a belt shouldn't have anything to do with getting...
he also beat froch, which negates what you said to some extent (but loses ground a little to him based on posts above) ward and calzaghe, yes...
i'm shocked
skills have nothing to do with a dodgy chin you're showing how little you actually know about boxing, just because you're trying too hard to be right
wlad's skills are better than vitali's ever were - redefining the way he fought had nothing to do with his technical skillset vitali and wlad...
I agree that froch pips Kessler, but bute was nothing more than a homespun paper champ who got destroyed the first time he stepped up groves...
on no planet is naseem an ATG lost to his first elite fighter, and then disappeared like a fart in the wind
yet what made wlad his name at HW was his ability to redefine himself after those brutal KO's - and he did it against sam peter, who was arguably...
yeah, i'm thinking this too 'warriors' can capture the imagination, and gatti's reputation became legendary (even though he would never have...
i'd like to argue the point that, as I've mentioned to you before, a host of European fighters failed to make their name in the US during roy's...
first 3 rounds would pretty much decide the fight Tyson would need to get to wlad in those rounds (and Tyson would have a chance to get to...