Crawford Spence Thurman Flip-flop Thurman and Spence if Thurman was an active fighter.
I'm still holding out hope for Lewis vs. Bowe.
This was the reason Horn was supposed to beat Crawford . . .
You don't need a "Hail Mary idea!", Oscar, when 50/50 is more than reasonable in the first place.
He's impressed me the last 2 fights. He's legitimately a very good boxer. I dont, however, understand what people are watching when they think...
If you fail to make 1 measly round competitive you don't deserve ****.
Lomachenko is a lot closer in size to Crawford than Crawford is to Golovkin. So he'd have a much better shot. I don't think he would win. But...
Depends on how content Loma is being the big fish in a little pond. Crawfish has bigger fish to fry.
I remember Thurman.
Have to hand it to Wilder. He has bent over backwards to make the fight happen. There's really no excuse for AJ now.
I think the last 2 posts sum up 95% of the discussions on this forum.
Crawford absolutely dominated an unbeaten champion who just dethroned an all time great. Loma got roughed up and dropped by some 4-loss cab...
Crawford is far more versatile than Spence. He'll switch southpaw and outbox the lefty.
Maybe for floor seats at the arena. Otherwise, no.
The way I see it there is no top welterweight in the world until Spence and Crawford fight for it. I can't imagine Thurman wants anything to do...
