He is great to watch it is amazing the power he generates with such little movement.
We are talking about an old Tyson here and a peak Rahman, if I look at this as being the Tyson that fought Mcbride and Williams, Tyson does not win.
He would defeat old Foreman a young Foreman yes but I wouldn't bet anything on it.
I think you are absolutely correct here especially when you say that although the four fighters were old they were in great shape especially...
I think Dempsey but we are underselling Norton who was a top tier fighter
If we say that the Tua of that period was the equal of Tyson you tend to think that Tyson would have been beaten I am a Tyson fan but Mcbride and...
You don't seem to see this sort of thing in fights so much now whether fighters are less schooled I am not sure.
To say Dempsey was not in the same class as Louis is wrong Louis is the superior fighter in most people's opinions but Dempsey is a great also and...
If we agree that it is a good guide we also have to ask how a couple of the Cubans would have gone in the pro ranks.
Your right I did.
He is in that mix and has the resume one of the best of the last thirty years.
I see him beating Ali but not Foreman this is a fight I can't pick my feeling with foreman is if he can hit you then he will beat you, I suppose...
A bit of an enigma in a way reasonable boxing skill and a good chin Tua got him after the bell and Lewis iced him like no one else was able to. I...
Willard is judged on his fight with Dempsey I don't believe he was as bad as he is rated here, he was not a great HW but much better than he...
I think it is important to understand that no before Dempsey had fought like him with his ferocity, you could not fight over fifty rounds the way...
