No one said he's bullet proof to those styles. I'm just saying he hasn't shown a stylistic weakness. You tend to perceive that he'd have a...
Ahuh. Ok, and yet the line above that you say: Implying what? :lol:
Taylor's performance > Cokes' performance. Easily. There to see for anyone that has eyes.
It's funny though, Cokes seemed to struggle quite a bit with smaller types: Stable, Alvarez, Napoles.
Cokes was outclassed often. Chavez at least always found a way to win in his prime.
You could have mentioned Chavez and Nelson but you chose Ramirez and Huagen. Straw man at it again. Obviously unpredictable **** can happen,...
And just to add to that, Beau Jack would have a better chance of beating Pernell than Ike Williams. Beau actually fared well against the movers,...
I think so too. Great at closing down the ring and super educated and ferocious on the inside. Whereas someone like Pryor would throw a lot of...
Williams had trouble with quite a few movers. You can add Bolanos and Mouzon to the list. The solid-ish cutesy types like Dawson and Carter also...
Just because it's fantasy head to head, doesn't mean anything goes. I can kind of see how it does for you, because you're basing it on no...
Cokes had a better career, but on the night Chavez faced him Taylor was a demon. He fought much better than Cokes did against Napoles.
Monzon was scared of Napoles even after he ko'ed him.
Napoles simply didn't face enough good fighters at 135 to force a fight with Ortiz. He faced some good fighters and could have been given a shot,...
On the styles front the only thing you've said is Whitaker would lose to Napoles and Pryor on the basis of his resume being worse than Napoles'....
Taylor at the point Chavez met him was a better fighter than Cokes imo and definitely better than Carlos Hernandez. Taylor put on one of the most...
