so much for...to beat tyson you have to stand up to him and hit him back :lol::rofl i'm not saying you said this but i'm referring to those who...
guys like you take success for granted. just do your job right for a day and people make a big deal about it...because it is a big deal. imagine...
i wouldn't go that far. i think the holyfield of 1990-1993 easily beats tua. after that point, holyfield was an inconsistent fighter. tyson...
tyson vs douglas
true...tyson didn't have hagler's warrior mentality (who did?) or hagler's skills.
excellent post. i strongly agree with the above. this is how tyson could have and was able to fight differently to have a better chance at beating...
tua's chin is overrated. as soon as lennox lewis ***** slapped him he stayed wimpering in his cornering like a scared puppy for the rest of the...
no it wouldn't. it'd be a very one sided fight ending with holyfield brutally knocking out ruddock. it wouldn't even be as competitive as ruddock...
obviously liston could be evil with his power out of the ring at times (like lamotta) but this is an example of where i root for his strength....
neither am i. i strongly agree with lefthook on that. i don't agree here. i think because we like tyson we're trying to downplay him. that...
that sounds reasonable enough but i'm going to have toe re-watch the fight. :good
i forgot to add...i'm not sure if stamina is going to be an issue for a brutal war that i doubt will go past 6 rounds...
i'm not saying that tyson has a great chin (one can have a legitimate argument for that)...but tyson's chin is clearly more PROVEN and battle...
i agree that douglas was very good...he WAS very good...but tyson allowed him to be very good whereas joe frazier would not...body punching would...
all right, fair enough. i have not watched enough marciano save for a few fights long time ago. if you say he has the skill to strategically fight...
