The Purrity loss was 15 ****ing years ago you clown.........LOL :rofl :lol: :yep
But don't you feel stupid now that he's corrected those problems? Does that make you feel ignorant for writing him off? You should...............
Ward would clown him.
This is correct, the hate for the Klitschkos here is is the charts...............:-(
Sanders did take a little bit of the beast out of Klitschko but in the end Wlad is a better overall boxer for the defeat. Let's all keep in...
See? This is a fair post, even though I disagree on a number of his points. Still, this guy makes sense with some of his arguments.
Also bull****.
One right hand or left hook from Wlad and Ruddock would've hit the canvas even harder than he did against Morrison.
Yeah, because Dokes is just as good of a boxer as Wladimir............... ****in' nimrod. :rofl It could happen but it sure isn't likely. Early...
I'd guess 2 losses with one pre Steward & one after he regresses. Which has yet to happen (as has been said already.)
Puff, puff, pass bro. The version of Tyson that Lewis beat was beaten before he entered the ring. Even so, prime Tyson loses to Lewis & either...
Henry might hug Wlad to death but he sure as hell isn't going to outbox him & his punches aren't powerful enough to cause serious damage even if...
Yeah, just like he beat Tommy Morrison right? Oh wait, Tommy knocked Ruddock the **** out with a single left hook. Damn, the lack of knowledge...
So you're on record saying Rahman is a better boxer than Byrd, Haye, Chagaev, Ibragimov, Thompson, Brock, etc.? Good luck with that............:lol:
No version of Holyfiled beats today's version of Wladimir. No way in hell.
