i know you didn't say that. i was just making a comparison to highlight the significance of those fights. they were parallel fights. in my...
fair enough. i'll say this, he'd certainly be widely known.
all got big before their images got tainted. i'm assuming that sullivan would be as he is from the start.
ooo just re-read your list of examples, best is a good one. he drank a lot and he was huge in britain. i could definitely see sullivan acquiring...
a lot of inconsistencies in there... but ok. we'll give sullivan the endorsements. my point about the endorsements was more that they are a...
yeah, louis is one of my favourites to watch. he had a great run, but for me, charles' run is maybe the greatest ever. eleven years, everything...
i must say that i don't agree with the consensus. i don't think he's got the look to be popular today. plus, these days top athletes need a...
knockdowns due to his style of fighting, off-balance etc.
looking at your list again, louis is the only one that really stands out... i guess we'll just have to agree to differ.
ah, you share my lack of admiration for foreman... don't worry, i'll get one!
if this is really what you think, fair enough. personally, when watching him on film and looking at his record, this isn't the conclusion i draw....
ok, what about this one. foreman > charles for manner of victory, and for achievements. charles > foreman for resume. foreman 2:1 charles!
you think virgil hill is on the same level as hagler? 160 is four weight classes (25 pounds) above 135. 175 is four weight classes (28 pounds)...
charles avenged pretty much every loss he ever had. he dropped some unavenged decisions to experienced fighters prior to 1943. he avenged...
he was 32 when he fought hagler and hearns. he'd been a fighter for fifteen years. hagler is one of the greatest middleweights of all time. hearns...
