duran fighting hearns at 154 and hagler at 160 in the eighties = hearns fighting toney at 168 and jones at 175 in the nineties. that was the point.
yeah mate. that's the whole point.
he rematched bivins and marshall several times successfully. fair enough about the formula. let's see your top twenty or so then.
ok, that's where we disagree then. 1943 wasn't disastrous... bivins and marshall were really good fighters. when you face everyone in one of the...
well, i'm not so sure. charles has resume, and louis has manner of victory. when it comes to achievements, i'd go for charles. he is the greatest...
oh, so you mean achievements. charles > louis for resume, head to head and achievements. but i guess you mean manner of victory when you say...
that would make no difference, as they are currently considered bums. if it turns out that the guys with incomplete records have even more losses,...
what do you mean by 'legacy'? what the fighter gave to the sport?
louis and marciano in every top five :cool:
frazier's 1-4 against ATGs, he's whack! :nut
mayweather's got a lot going for him, i just wish he'd fight more. i want to see him fight martinez at 160 but it would never happen. if he did i...
i think you are one of the more clear and coherent posters on the forum, regardless of whether i agree with what you're saying. i just end up in...
teeto's gonna explode :rofl
well, it's just my interpretation of his declining skills. i wasn't inferring anything from his record as such. also, the very fact he retired a...
real insight. i've always thought that was why ali kept fighting on despite claiming that he'd retire numerous times. he was obsessed with winning...
