that wasn't my point. he seemed to be focusing on conditioning to the neglect of boxing. martinez is a good fighter at a weight williams is...
lora gets it!
they were simpler times. less money, fewer prizes and fame was harder to come by. as a result they fought more, champs were champs, and people...
yeah bodhi i agree. did you see that video of paul williams training before the second martinez fight? he was doing all kinds of crazy stuff, but...
funny how the best win of the 80s came in 1980, the 90s in 1990 and the 00s in 2000. some great work, popkins, thanks!
just realised that i mentioned four of my top six pound for pounders... no coincidence i'd say. the other two, robinson and greb, were true greats...
i think armstrong is the most clear-cut candidate. he could be in the top ten at featherweight, lightweight and welterweight. i don't think...
every fighter has either stayed the same, or (more often) gone up in my estimation since i first came across this forum. apart from roy jones.
surprised no one has mentioned 154. i've always thought of 147 as being the highest that 'little guys' can get to, and 160 as the first weight...
i agree, boxed ears. but i'd go further... holmes is the most complete heavyweight that there has been.
ignorance has nothing to do with age. on topic, boxrec is great. the amazing thing about it, i think, is that plenty of journeyman fighters from...
i don't think it's so much that they damage their legacies by continuing, but more so that if fighters retire at the 'right time' they end up with...
the last time charles made 160 was 1942, and the first time he tipped the scales at over the light heavyweight limit was five years after that in...
ah ok, that was my first inclination. sending mixed messages teeto!
who, pacquiao? if so... that was my point! and if you meant williams... yeah that was also the point. a sub-point, if you will.
