@ Absolutely - Seriously? No, not John Ruiz. But any number of Champs or top contenders after 1960. Some that come to mind are Cassius Clay,...
lol Nascar drivers usually use catheters.
This is a perfect example of the kind of crap we're having to deal with. Glover would also tell you that Lewis' victory over Tyson was a quality...
Yes, there is a big difference, Holyfield has a shot at beating Frazier; Holyfield has no chance against a prime Tyson.
This would be a great fight to see! It could go either way. Too close to call.
Roy Jones Jr, Michael Spinks, and Bernard Hopkins would absolutely school Corbett. They'd make him look like a fumbling amateur toughman competitor.
LMFAO!!!!!!!!! Ironically enough, i laughed so hard reading this thread, that i just **** myself!!! LOL!
Lennox aged better than Larry, but a prime Holmes (79-80) beats any version of Lewis.
GREAT post! Larry is so right. Spot on.
If you really think that Klitschko or Lewis could've beat prime Tyson (87 - 88 ), you are "Absolutely" on drugs lol.
...and then Lewis shows up and decides to fight them after they're all beat up and old lol.
I've met Clay in person. He was the same height as me, 6 ft 2in.
If you want to discuss modern era fighters who would've dominated the 20's, there are better examples to use than Lewis.
It's hard to take someone seriously when they say Lewis and Klitschko are the two greatest HWs of all time. Really, get serious.
Glover, your estimation of Klitschko's (and Lewis') skills and abilities are greatly and unrealistically exaggerated. I'm not saying they're bad...
