Are you ****ing serious? His left look was crap. :o
No, you left out Napoles! You and I are his biggest fans on here.
Yep. Prime Napoles was as skilled as anyone.
I prefer fights like Napoles-Cokes, where a good fighter is simply outclassed in all areas, takes a sustained beating and can't manage even a few...
I particularly like this. I may use it - with the proper credits, of course: Fear not, those Hagler and Barkley (and Buchanan) jibes were just...
Did anyone else note the absurdity here? :nut
Duran's win over Barkley, though incredible, could have gone the other way. His performance against Hagler is slightly overrated. Even though he...
Leonard went 80-2-1 between 1917 until his 1924 retirement. One loss was a disqualification to Britton. Record against Hall of Famers within...
Just my opinion, and I don't like to say it, but Ali above Louis for his superior wins.
Charles at #4 is fine. As long as Benny Leonard's #3 ;)
Louis is difficult. Personally I find it hard to rate him over Ali, but it seems wrong to rate him more than a place or two away. Such a long,...
Yeah that's fine. But in fairness you should maybe rate Armstrong lower if you think that. Armstrong's career before 1937 combined with his post...
As a rough rule it seems to be that the most common sizes have the biggest talent pools. So a pound-for-pound list would predictably consist...
If you could imagine Muhammad Ali going 3-0 against Joe Louis (Moore), 4-1 against Harry Wills (Bivins) and 5-0 against Ken Norton (Maxim), then...
You seem like a conscientious poster and that list is perfectly reasonable. As a whole top twenty two, I have nearly all of the same names. My...
