Any good puncher with a proven chin can given Dempsey trouble. I think he would weather the worst of it by round 3 or 4 if I'm honest. Dempsey KO.
Off the top of my head Louis and Dempsey would be pretty competitive today. You'll find the vast majority of people disagree.
Before you go calling someone else delusional and to put the crack pipe down you should probably make sure your own opinions don't sound 100x more...
I seriously doubt there's any footage not already out that would set off any light bulbs in people's heads. Plenty of people aren't even mildly...
The point of argumentation is to come into agreement or find some common ground. Clearly we will not so why argue? It's a waste of time.
God forbid boxing dogma be questioned.
Dude there's no point we won't ever agree lol
We can't seem to agree on what happened in even the first half. No point in debating the rest. Let's agree to disagree.
I'll agree with that however I don't think any of these guys would be the favorite. As far as consistency goes Norton was much better than any of...
I think he was slightly better than the average contender in the 1920s purely because of his brawling ability but that's it. Not a fighter worth...
Sharkey and Walcott certainly lose. Norton's style is horrible for Sharkey and Walcott picked up a loss from practically ever good fighter he...
That's alright man. I think we should just agree to disagree about the 2nd Schmeling-Sharkey bout.
Norton would beat all 4 of those guys.
Name anyone on his resume that he beat that is better than Norton.
We can debate that if you want. Kalambay's resume is inflated with cans. Steve Collins had like 16 fights...
