so wlad is a hall of famer though? lalonde is not. lalonde does not have a massive string of defenses against even mediocre competition....
Do you think the size difference is the same as well? You have a choice of so many smaller fighters overcoming larger ones and you pick one with...
I liked it anyway :yep and you think leonard is comparable at all to rocky? Or lalonde is to wlad? the first comparison is especially questionable
Well you didnt really address the points of why that comparison is ludicrous. other tham saying lalond was outjabbing ray and that wlad isnt A...
your opinion is always welcome vic:good
do you think he believed he could beat dawson or that he was simply forced into that one?
agreed. if he's aware of satterfield's power and respects it, he avoids him for 3 rounds and knocks him out in the 5th
:lol:so you think lalonde is as good as wlad and rocky is as good as leonard?! leonard was an ex-welter who had already bulked up to 160...and...
i like it...though i'm finding i'm much harder on hagler in recent times. he could box, he could brawl and his boxer-puncher performances were...
fair list. in terms of who is just plain better, i'd probably put duran above ali (that pains me...) and pep. duran just brought more to the table
depends who...will cleverley help his legacy at all? will anyone else add much of anything? he could beat the non-dawson/wards for another 5...
i've had trouble justifying it lately but honestly he's in mine because i simply cannot think of 10 fighters...EVER...who were better than him
:happy:happy
he's also the best fighter never to win a meaningful fight, the best fighter not to beat a top 10 opponent, etc.
nah, young would confused by all that "punching" and "offense" nonsense hopkins did
