at almost 38 years old...lol...and floyd would make him come to 147....so hed be drained.
cotto or ocar.
:lol: :rofl :rasta
Floyd had better foot speed. Better defense. More ring smarts. NEVER makes mistakes. More controlled. More accurate.
Oscar did challenge him...
Thats something we cant be sure of for sure...when it comes to was hit less...we really dont know. I do know that NO ONE can come in here and...
There is NOTHING bout Kessler that is elite. You can make an argument Calzaghe has elite speed and boxing skills. Keslers power isnt even...
Oh lord..P4P Mosley was a creature....too much speed...to much power. and is it just me or Kessler stiff as hell when he fights.
Joe Calzaghes resume isnt even close to Floyds.
He is.....the are two completly diffrent fighters and I can see why one would have an arguement both ways.....BUT...Floyd has better defense then...
Hell Id pick a 99 year old Mayweather aginst Vanes..Mayweather UD.
I honestyly think against Floyd Vanes would pee on hiself before the bell..and then proceed to get brutally KO'd within 30 seconds.
Thats just my opionion. I think P4P Floyds defense and smarts would have him eek out RJ in a close fight.
This is a tough argument for me because I love both fighters but I'll continue...I think Jones probly had the ability to block punches with his...
I never said RJ didnt have technical ability.......I said Floyd had better defense because he uses reflexes AND he uses his gloves to block...
