To put it bluntly it's the ability of power and paw.
Mayweather has better handwork in his jab.. Khan has better handspeed in his jab.
Mike Tyson has good handspeed and handwork for his hook punches.
An excellent hook with a basic jab = Cleverly An excellent hook with a very good jab = Bellew Both guys have 'shown' excellent hooks.. one has...
Bellew has all the dimensions. You'll see it as a hook with his jab.. but it's a jab with the hook. Aka the most important of the two.
You'll see it I guess. Not saying I dislike or like the talking.. it's just you can separate it from the fighting.. you could have no voice in...
I'd jump on the bandwagon or ride it as they say. Bellew is something special at 200 lbs. Something to brag about.. that's just me.
Exciting "boxing" matches lol.
And beat oldies or LHWs.
Literally got busted up by Busters jab.. had the privilege of fighting at 18 and couldn't do a Lennox Lewis.. or even a George Foreman.
But still the fight is doing the bill etc. Even after Pac losing etc. Like it wouldn't have mattered if the result was the same when Mike Tyson...
I mean Mayweather.. he's got this far.. if he can get to 50-0 and retire it'd be good for "boxing".
It's basically Twitter #1 vs. Twitter #2. But the same fight as Mayweather vs. Marquez (in the least) It could be a little bit better who...
Shot only works if you have a Jibjab.. otherwise your flaws are being introduced to Murphys Law (and Occams Razor).
I mean with an old Louis who prolly woulda gone 3-0 in rematches if he tried. There wasn't much to fight.
